yakuza
18 Apr 2008, 22:28
All these websites are written by people who aren't retarded, but 5 retards in one!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&client=opera&rls=es-es&hs=doI&q=worms+armageddon+genre+artillery&btnG=Buscar&lr=
I can't believe quakerworm could ever have the guts to imply Worms wasn't a turn based strategy game!
Xfire must be out of their minds
http://fr.xfire.com/genre/artlry/artillery/
Also, I'm some sort of low life and a bunch of other equally offensive things just because I implied for one second quakerworm had his reasons to believe what he did.
So, the question is: Is it reasonable to label Worms as a turn based artillery game instead of a turn based strategy game? I mean, I'm sure it's both and that either pick would be a valid one (the same way Worms could also be called a racing game), but surely someone isn't 5 retards in one for implying it's one instead of the other?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&client=opera&rls=es-es&hs=doI&q=worms+armageddon+genre+artillery&btnG=Buscar&lr=
I can't believe quakerworm could ever have the guts to imply Worms wasn't a turn based strategy game!
Xfire must be out of their minds
http://fr.xfire.com/genre/artlry/artillery/
Also, I'm some sort of low life and a bunch of other equally offensive things just because I implied for one second quakerworm had his reasons to believe what he did.
So, the question is: Is it reasonable to label Worms as a turn based artillery game instead of a turn based strategy game? I mean, I'm sure it's both and that either pick would be a valid one (the same way Worms could also be called a racing game), but surely someone isn't 5 retards in one for implying it's one instead of the other?