View Full Version : Robo's Art. (No, not any blurring)
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 08:10
Yes, it's time for me to pick up the pencil and start drawing. I can actually have a go at sigworms if you like...
wigwam the
1 Oct 2006, 08:32
Yes, it's time for me to pick up the pencil and start drawing. I can actually have a go at sigworms if you like...
ok...
draw me please.
Draw a worm eating a snake, while playing a piano.
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 09:17
I just have to try slick's suggestion.
Here it is!
Preasure
1 Oct 2006, 11:01
Hmm, he's actually doing what we tell him to...
Draw the meaning of life, coloured in with the colour of the innermost reaches of your soul. With a worm on it.
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 11:06
Ever read "The Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy"?
Ever read "The Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy"?
Have only read the first 3 pages of the book, tis very funny.
I've seen the film though, which is great.
Draw a worm throwing a giant cake at Sonic the hedgehog.
agent luke
1 Oct 2006, 13:49
Draw a worm biting its finger while yanking its cheek back on a 2 ton rotten tomato.
Pigbuster
1 Oct 2006, 15:09
Have only read the first 3 pages of the book, tis very funny.
I've seen the film though, which is great.
Guh?
You really should read the whole thing, my friend.
Akuryou13
1 Oct 2006, 15:12
oh god! those worms! they look sick! take them too an eye doctor immediately, I think they have eyestoobigitis!! :p
Liketyspli
1 Oct 2006, 16:22
Draw me A worm holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on 3 sticks holding a cow on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a sheep on an iron pipe holding a worm on a stick holding a pine apple on a stick holding a microwave on a stick.
Alien King
1 Oct 2006, 16:54
oh god! those worms! they look sick! take them too an eye doctor immediately, I think they have eyestoobigitis!! :p
Inflammation of the *pause* eyestoobiges?
Don't worry too much, I understood.
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 17:49
AAAAAARGH!
Too many requests for strange art!
Please, one at a time.
Whoever posts the next request will have it done. Others must wait till I've done that one, then they can say theirs.
Kelster23
1 Oct 2006, 17:58
Draw me trying to find "eyestoobigitis" in the dictionary, with Akuryou correcting the spelling, and Psyke as a zombie poking the back of his head.
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 18:11
There we are.
Liketyspli
1 Oct 2006, 18:14
First of all, eyestoobigitis is the correct spelling (look at Aku's Post) and when did Psyke lost his hair and goggles?!
@kelster: Why not Vader as a zombie poked by psyke.
Draw me A worm holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a worm on 3 sticks holding a cow on a stick holding a worm on a stick holding a sheep on an iron pipe holding a worm on a stick holding a pine apple on a stick holding a microwave on a stick.
robowurmz
1 Oct 2006, 18:16
First of all, eyestoobigitis is the correct spelling (look at Aku's Post) and when did Psyke lost his hair and goggles?!
Psyke's hair rotted off, and his goggles were destroyed in the event which caused him to be a zombie.
Kelster23
1 Oct 2006, 18:42
First of all, eyestoobigitis is the correct spelling (look at Aku's Post) and when did Psyke lost his hair and goggles?!
@kelster: Why not Vader as a zombie poked by psyke.
Because Psyke died, therefore, he should be a zombie.
philby4000
1 Oct 2006, 19:20
I really miss the days when even the bad fanartists couls at least give their abominations tails.
GIVE YOUR ABOMINATIONS TAILS.
Preasure
1 Oct 2006, 21:21
Ever read "The Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy"?
I said the meaning of life, not the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything. 'What is the meaning of life' is not the question. :p ;)
Shockdude
1 Oct 2006, 22:29
draw a worm leading an army of real earthworms
wormthingy
1 Oct 2006, 22:34
draw your sigworm being chased off the forum by the fan artists
or
draw every forummer with 2000+ posts! it was one of my first requests i had to draw :(
Kelster23
2 Oct 2006, 04:13
draw your sigworm being chased off the forum by the fan artists
or
draw every forummer with 2000+ posts! it was one of my first requests i had to draw:(
I vote for the first one.
robowurmz
2 Oct 2006, 07:40
My sigworm would actually probably just use his laser weapons to make a hole in the wall and melt some titanium back over it so no-one would get him.
wormthingy
2 Oct 2006, 12:55
My sigworm would actually probably just use his laser weapons to make a hole in the wall and melt some titanium back over it so no-one would get him.
but that wouldn't be what i requested, would it:p
agent luke
2 Oct 2006, 13:34
My sigworm would actually probably just use his laser weapons to make a hole in the wall and melt some titanium back over it so no-one would get him.
Then we would just change are sigworms to worms with titanium blasters:p
Liketyspli
2 Oct 2006, 15:03
Then my sigworm would grab the uber battle truck that ran over beardy drawn by maverisstef and drive around the wall.... ok, this is silly. draw WT's first request now, that would be fun.
Akuryou13
3 Oct 2006, 00:16
@kelster: Why not Vader as a zombie poked by psyke.I don't think vader is actually a zombie at all, he's just got a taste for brains. :p
Pigbuster
4 Oct 2006, 02:38
He didn't say Vader WAS a zomie, but Vader AS a zombie.
Whether robots can be zombies is a whole other question.
Robozombie... he DOES like brains a lot... hmmm
WormOfFire
6 Oct 2006, 14:55
Draw Liketyspli on a stick.
What?:rolleyes:
BuffaloKid
6 Oct 2006, 19:58
Ever read "The Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy"?
... 42's not the meaning of life, it's the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything (speculated to be 'What do you get if you multipy six by nine' (wrong), 'What do you get if you multiply six by seven' (Decorrupted), 'Think of a number' (As said by Marvin: 'Think of a number' 'seven' 'wrong') or something else entirely)
Gardy Looo
7 Oct 2006, 00:42
Then what if the ultimate question is "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and Everything", that means 42, IS the meaning, but also making it only an answer, and not a statement.
YAY for paradoxial loopholes.
Akuryou13
7 Oct 2006, 01:06
Then what if the ultimate question is "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and Everything", that means 42, IS the meaning, but also making it only an answer, and not a statement.
YAY for paradoxial loopholes.that's an assumption of what the question is. the question wasn't given, I don't believe. there was another computer working on that one :p
Kelster23
7 Oct 2006, 05:54
Then what if the ultimate question is "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and Everything", that means 42, IS the meaning, but also making it only an answer, and not a statement.
YAY for paradoxial loopholes.
No, the ultimate question is: What came first-The chicken or the egg?
Pigbuster
7 Oct 2006, 06:27
The egg.
Dinosaurs kinda came before chickens.
agent luke
7 Oct 2006, 13:57
i'd say the answer to that question is....Breakfast! mmm..Chicken and eggs.Or you could say "Who in the hell of it cares?!"
He didn't say Vader WAS a zomie, but Vader AS a zombie.
Whether robots can be zombies is a whole other question.
No, no, no. For me to be a zombie I would have to have been dead at some point. This has never happened and therefore I cannot become a zombie.
I eat brains to charge my fuel cells and receive input. I can turn those whose brains I eat into zombies. I am not a zombie; I just control them.
If my programme were to be hacked and replaced with a simple slave drone programme, some would consider me a zombie.
Think about it like that, are all computers not just mechanical zombies? Stick that in your comic and smoke it.
Preasure
7 Oct 2006, 19:10
As annoying as Windows can be, it doesn't attempt to eat my brains. :p
Kelster23
7 Oct 2006, 19:12
The egg.
Dinosaurs kinda came before chickens.
And where did the egg come from?
philby4000
8 Oct 2006, 01:17
A Dinosaur.
Do try to pay attention.
Kelster23
8 Oct 2006, 06:19
A Dinosaur.
Do try to pay attention.
And the dinosaur came from?
Pigbuster
8 Oct 2006, 07:40
The primordial soup.
Which came from MOON PEOPLE.
Which came from GOD.
Which came from EGG.
So you see, the egg really did come first.
Preasure
8 Oct 2006, 10:20
Since every chicken originates from its egg, it seems obvious the egg came first. Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.
Thank you, wikipedia. Now, can we have some art? Or at least a return to on-topic-ness?
Paul.Power
8 Oct 2006, 14:55
Would you be happy with a better class of off-topic-ness?
Humankind has always had an urge to explore and colonise. But why exactly have we? "Well, why not?" isn't a valid answer here. We have to look deeper...
Overcrowding
The population of this planet is expanding exponentially. Many countries do not have the resources to cope with this, and the quality of life is therefore lowered. Despite attempts to counteract this by such measures and limiting family size and delaying marriages, the fact is that population growth is out of control. We need somewhere to house these extra people...
Disasters
A great big asteroid could hit Earth at any time, and that's a fact. They're all over the place, asteroids, and one could be coming this way right this minute...
Okay, enough scaremongering. But it could happen. That's why we need to spread out. If we colonised Mars, and sent half of Earth's population there, then if an asteroid hit Earth we could recolonise it from Mars (and, of course, the reverse is true. If something hit Mars, we could recolonise from Earth). This may seem a little heartless, but it's better than us all staying here and all getting wiped out...
Mineral Wealth
In 350 years time, we'll run out of aluminium. And that's the one we've got most of. There's less than 18 years of tin left, 23 of lead, 68 of zinc... I don't have to paint a picture. There's a decent probability that we will find untapped resources of these minerals on other planets - such as Mars. We don't know until we check...
Space Exploration
When it comes to sending things into space, Earth is a bit of a gravity well. The Moon has a gravitational strength 1/6 of the Earth's; Mars has a gravitational strength of 1/3 of the Earth's. Most of the fuel needed for space exploration is used escaping a planet's gravitational pull - so obviously the less the pull, the less the fuel needed to escape.
Building Biospheres
It would be interesting for the purposes of scientific research to learn how to develop a planet's atmosphere, biosphere and so on into one suitable for life to flourish. Why? Because it would be a bit like a speeded-up version of how our own Earth got up to speed and eventually lead to us members of the primate family becoming arguably the most intelligent species on the planet (if only because the others can't argue back. Sorry, any creationists out there...). This could once and for all settle the question "Why (or at least How) are we here?"
^this is not a school, do not post your essays here!
Quite interesting tough! And true nonetheless!
SuperBlob
9 Oct 2006, 21:55
How does Willy Russell show the
changing nature of Rita and
Frank’s relationship?
Rita, the title character of the play is a generally very direct and open 26-year-old hairdresser who starts rather uneasily in the play. She yearns for an education, and wants to earn a ‘choice’ in her life. She has never--^this is not a school, do not post your essays here!
...Damn :(
Kelster23
9 Oct 2006, 22:58
^this is not a school, do not post your essays here!
Fine. We will post someone else's essays here!
Paul.Power
15 Oct 2006, 21:03
Rita... is a generally very direct and open 26-year-old hairdresserI'm not sure why that clause made me laugh. I think it's the specificness of "26-year-old hairdresser". It makes it sound like 26-year-old hairdressers are a seperate species...
And you need a comma after "play"
robowurmz
20 Oct 2006, 14:01
Okay, I have come up with a new style, and I hope it looks more like the convential style of worms, which often looks better and more sophisticated than midget worms with no tails and eyestoobigitis.
Here it is... (http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/41698270/)
Gardy Looo
20 Oct 2006, 14:37
Well, now he has "eyestoosquareitis" now. :p
robowurmz
20 Oct 2006, 14:51
Yeah, yeah, okay. I'll round them off a little next time.
SuperBlob
20 Oct 2006, 16:53
Okay, I have come up with a new style, and I hope it looks more like the convential style of worms, which often looks better and more sophisticated than midget worms with no tails and eyestoobigitis.
Here it is... (http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/41698270/)
...that's not the conventional style :p
philby4000
20 Oct 2006, 19:02
When you round the eyes can you also attach them to the worm's face?
Kelster23
20 Oct 2006, 21:56
Nice style. But eyes do not pop out of your head unless you are on Loony Toons or something. I think it's part of perspective.
robowurmz
21 Oct 2006, 08:38
Okey-dokey, I'll attempt to keep those squarish things moe round and firmly glued to the worm's head.
EDIT:
Tadaaaaaa!
Paul.Power
21 Oct 2006, 10:04
Things I Will Never Understand #1:
Why do people keep throwing out flawed but interesting styles in favour of stuff that looks like everyone else's?
robowurmz
21 Oct 2006, 11:30
That's no flaw!
That's a worm.
I'm hoping mine looks more like the conventional style so people can recognise them.
Paul.Power
21 Oct 2006, 11:37
That's no flaw!
That's a worm.
I'm hoping mine looks more like the conventional style so people can recognise them.While I concede that that is one weakness of an unusual style (I've lost track of the number of times people have called my worms *****es by mistake), I think it's safe to assume that as this is the Team 17 fanart forum, people here will recognise them.
Things I Will Never Understand #1:
Why do people keep throwing out flawed but interesting styles in favour of stuff that looks like everyone else's?
Because Picasso never made comics.
Kelster23
21 Oct 2006, 18:28
Because Picasso never made comics.
Picasso couldn't draw faces all that well near the end either. So therefore, as long as you can make something recognizable, it won't be classified as abstract. Just don't make them Picasso style, please.
Cisken1
23 Oct 2006, 08:22
Just don't make them Picasso style, please.
But I like the new C4 Picasso!
robowurmz
24 Nov 2006, 07:36
Tadaaaaaa!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/43566217/
Paul.Power
24 Nov 2006, 10:48
Picasso couldn't draw faces all that well near the end either. So therefore, as long as you can make something recognizable, it won't be classified as abstract. Just don't make them Picasso style, please.It's been a while, I know but rereading the post I just couldn't resist...
Apocalypse
24 Nov 2006, 13:16
It's been a while, I know but rereading the post I just couldn't resist...Ehm.. no offence but that's not picasso style.. this is simply cubic.
And it's nice too :P
Error404
24 Nov 2006, 15:18
Ehm.. no offence but that's not picasso style [...]
I'd have to agree...
[...] this is simply cubic.
Not quite... if it were, it would be more like Picasso. Don't know if you heard, but Picasso's style was called "Cubism". Which consists in a way of deconstructing the objects and reconstructing them flatened.
I'd say Paul was closer to Picasso with his old style, in which both eyes appeared on the same side of the head (i know this one presents this characteristic as well) instead of with this straight-lined drawing. :)
Paul.Power
24 Nov 2006, 15:35
Meh. I dropped out of Art at the first opportunity.
Which, given about... ooh, 85% of my artistic development has happened since then, probably wasn't that bad an idea.
I think this (http://www.fantasyarts.net/Fantasy_art_work_gallery/Weeping_woman_Picasso.jpg) was the picture I had in mind when I drew.
Apocalypse
24 Nov 2006, 16:19
...but Picasso's style was called "Cubism".... You got me there..
Meh. I dropped out of Art at the first opportunity.Art was taken away from me :(
The only way to keep folowing it, was to take it as an extra study... wich was already taken by something, I found, that was more important..
robowurmz
24 Nov 2006, 17:46
*Looks*
*Sees no comments about new drawing*
*Looks*
*Sees Picasso/Cubism style drawing*
*Laughs*
Hi everyone. It's been a while!
Edit:
NEW ART!!!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/43587268/
Error404
24 Nov 2006, 18:47
It seems they have just one eyeball with 2 pupils on it...
Freaks! :eek:
robowurmz
24 Nov 2006, 21:52
Well, hey, that's what W: OW on DS looks like too! And if you put W4:M's resolution to 640 x 480, they look like that too.
Kelster23
25 Nov 2006, 01:04
...
Nice expressions. Had to put it on full view to see it though. :p
Damn! Forgot to leave a DA comment!
*comments*
robowurmz
25 Nov 2006, 09:37
Now, introducing, Worm TV!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/43622687/
Well, actually, It's just an edit of computer-drawn worm, but it looks good with the "TeeVee" logo in the corner. And the CRT screen bulge and glare...
Liketyspli
25 Nov 2006, 12:24
Well, actually, It's just an edit of computer-drawn worm, but it looks good with the "TeeVee" logo in the corner. And the CRT screen bulge and glare...
So why do you post it then?
Your computer drawn worms are better than your not-computer drawn worms.
But you'll need to get rid of the little flaws.
robowurmz
26 Nov 2006, 09:10
So why do you post it then?
Your computer drawn worms are better than your not-computer drawn worms.
But you'll need to get rid of the little flaws.
Because it does look like a TV. And it has a logo on-screen. Have you seen it yet?
Kelster23
26 Nov 2006, 23:35
Because it does look like a TV. And it has a logo on-screen. Have you seen it yet?
Yes.
Isn't that just a warping method called 'buldge' or something like that?
But the screen around the outside was a nice effect.
robowurmz
27 Nov 2006, 17:16
Yes.
Isn't that just a warping method called 'buldge' or something like that?
But the screen around the outside was a nice effect.
(I'm using a 60 day trial of PSP 8 until I find my disc) Yeah, it was lens distortion, Fisheye. I like the "TeeVee" logo in the corner, and the on light best. All my own work!
Akuryou13
5 Dec 2006, 01:35
So why do you post it then?because it was the obligatory "I found a new toy so I'm going to exploit it" post. just about every artist does it.
Paul.Power
5 Dec 2006, 08:50
because it was the obligatory "I found a new toy so I'm going to exploit it" post. just about every artist does it.
I don't think I do that.
Oh, no, wait. The "Add Noise" tool...
Cisken1
15 Dec 2006, 08:35
I don't think I do that.
Oh, no, wait. The "Add Noise" tool...
OH NO, NOT NOISE, NOT NOISE!!!
I hate it when people do that!
Paul.Power
15 Dec 2006, 09:49
OH NO, NOT NOISE, NOT NOISE!!!
I hate it when people do that!Don't see why, it's a handy way to create a rough or metallic texture, or a starry sky.
Apocalypse
15 Dec 2006, 10:13
The noise tool is very handy! You can make animal skin with it, just motion blur it afterwards ;)
Cisken1
18 Dec 2006, 23:48
There ware WAY better methods than noise! BARGHE!
robowurmz
29 Dec 2006, 14:33
Since getting my XB360, my mouse skills have become amazingly differently better! Check out these worms I drew! They're much better than cyclopses.
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/45557589/
Liketyspli
29 Dec 2006, 17:20
Yes, that is better, but why don't you download GIMP or something, oh and dont rush on the eyebrows... and the worm on the middle left looks mutated...
robowurmz
29 Dec 2006, 20:01
Ok, and yeah, the middle left one is...odd. He went out at fall-out time.
robowurmz
6 Jan 2007, 11:09
NEW ART! Emotion Sheet and Simplified Version!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/46075256/
Liketyspli
7 Jan 2007, 21:33
Again: Dont rush it.
And simple style looks like a copy of _Kilburn's simple style.
robowurmz
8 Jan 2007, 07:18
It does? Oh, Sugarpuffs.
I wanted it to be different from his style. It is, in a way.
robowurmz
27 Feb 2007, 10:22
Time to bump this old thread, and get some new art in there for 2007!
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/49743494/
:D
MtlAngelus
27 Feb 2007, 12:01
What's with the copyright anyway, not like someone is going to steal that image, nor would it matter much would it?
robowurmz
27 Feb 2007, 14:28
What's with the copyright anyway, not like someone is going to steal that image, nor would it matter much would it?
Meh, I just wondered if the creative commons licence would actually DO anything...
And the copyright thing? Oh, that's just to show that I drew it. :P, I've seen some work stolen before, and meh, whatever.
Pigbuster
28 Feb 2007, 06:12
And the copyright thing? Oh, that's just to show that I drew it. :P, I've seen some work stolen before, and meh, whatever.
If someone really wanted to, they could easily white that out, you know. :p
And you shouldn't worry about your art being stolen. You're not making a profit off of it, so it doesn't really matter.
philby4000
28 Feb 2007, 16:07
If someone really wanted to, they could easily white that out, you know. :p
And you shouldn't worry about your art being stolen. You're not making a profit off of it, so it doesn't really matter.
Art theft is nothing to be incredibly paranoid about, but when it happened to me I can only describe my feelings towards the thief as 'Severe Rage'.:mad:
Alien King
28 Feb 2007, 17:36
And you shouldn't worry about your art being stolen. You're not making a profit off of it, so it doesn't really matter.
Imagine though, if they were to try and make profit from it, especially when you were not.
Pigbuster
2 Mar 2007, 03:58
Ohoho, I remember that one.
SgtBrookes, OOH what a smelly. :p
I do think that you have a right to get mad if your art is stolen, but you really shouldn't put watermarks on your art. It makes it look lousy.
However, in Photoshop there seems to be a tool that causes slight distortion to the image, which creates an invisible watermark that can be read back. Those are fine. And neat, to boot.
Basti@n
30 Mar 2007, 21:38
You can draw me if you want...
Wow! Someone just revived this thread after almost a complete month!
I always put on the options "Show threads from the last month" and the rules say that posting in a thread with no posts since 30 days or 1 month is reviving... And with "Show threads from the last month" option the forum showed it...
Kelster23
30 Mar 2007, 21:42
Wow! Someone just revived this thread after almost a complete month!
Pigbuster
30 Mar 2007, 23:06
You can draw me if you want...
I always put on the options "Show threads from the last month" and the rules say that posting in a thread with no posts since 30 days or 1 month is reviving... And with "Show threads from the last month" option the forum showed it...
I think that if a thread is 2+ weeks old and you post something that doesn't add to the conversation much, it's going to be interpreted as reviving.
Akuryou13
31 Mar 2007, 03:23
You can draw me if you want...
I always put on the options "Show threads from the last month" and the rules say that posting in a thread with no posts since 30 days or 1 month is reviving... And with "Show threads from the last month" option the forum showed it...grey. it's the area between black and white. you should look into it a bit more.
Paul.Power
31 Mar 2007, 16:33
Yes, I'm definitely going to call Basti@n "Mrs. Cake" from now on.
Liketyspli
31 Mar 2007, 16:36
Yes, I'm definitely going to call Basti@n "Mrs. Cake" from now on.
Mhhh let's see...
Liketysplitt = Bob
Basti@n = Mrs. Cake
There was another one...
There was a guy called "Alfred".
Don't remember who though!
;)
robowurmz
31 Mar 2007, 20:01
CoughcoughMrs.CakeisfromTerryPratchettcoughcoughan dthereisanAlbertwhoisDeath'sapprenticecoughcough
Preasure
31 Mar 2007, 20:03
Oh my. Please, somebody get these people some education. :p
robowurmz
31 Mar 2007, 20:19
CoughcoughOhhelpcoughcoughithinkihavebronchitiscou ghcoughcoughcoughcoughocough....
COUGH....
*hooiiiiik----ptoo*
That's better.
:)
Paul.Power
31 Mar 2007, 23:09
Well, it's just that it's twice now he's edited his post to quote someone below him. And that's just screwing with my head.
AlbertwhoisDeath'sapprentice
Death's MANSERVANT. MANSERVANT.
'Sides which, I wasn't even referencing that. Otherwise I'd have called him Albert and not Alfred because I am not that thick.
And oh yeah, you forgot farazparsa. He's Derek.
Kelster23
31 Mar 2007, 23:44
Just wondering, out of all things, why Mrs.Cake?
Paul.Power
31 Mar 2007, 23:59
Just wondering, out of all things, why Mrs.Cake?If you are familiar with the books and are still asking that, then you haven't read this thread (or this one (http://http://forum.team17.co.uk/showthread.php?t=31767)) thoroughly enough.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.